USPAP-Compliant · Personal Property · U.S. & Canada
After a burglary, a theft, or a loss such as fire or flood, the claim turns on a question the items can no longer answer for themselves: what was there, and what was it worth? The valuation must be reconstructed from documentation — and documentation-driven valuation is this practice's standard methodology in every engagement, not an accommodation.
The practice values stolen, destroyed, and damaged personal property — jewelry, watches, handbags, fine art, collections — for insurance claims and the disputes that follow, retained by policyholders' counsel and by carriers. Common engagements include valuing a jewelry or handbag collection lost in a burglary from photographs, receipts, and records.
Yes. Value is developed as of the date of loss from the documentation the items left behind — photographs, receipts, schedules, prior appraisals — with the scope of work and assumptions disclosed in the report. Retrospective effective dates are standard appraisal practice.
Photographs of the items in use or at home, purchase receipts and card statements, prior appraisals, insurance schedules, repair and service records, and provenance documents. More documentation narrows the assumptions; engagements routinely proceed on partial records.
Both. Engagements come from policyholders' counsel and from carriers, and the analysis is identical either way. Fees are never contingent on findings or on the amount of any claim.
No. The practice provides independent valuation and expert analysis; it does not negotiate claims or act as a public adjuster. Counsel and licensed professionals handle advocacy, and the reports serve whichever forum the claim reaches.
Engagements are quoted by engagement letter based on scope of work, time, and complexity — the number of items, the state of documentation, and the intended use of the report. Fees are never contingent on appraised value.